Which blockchains offer tokenized stocks?

Chain coverage in the Tokenzo registry

This table is generated from the registry snapshot used by the app. It counts each issuer instrument once on each chain, even when it has multiple deployments there. The same underlying company can have several issuer instruments, so these are not counts of unique companies.

Mapped instruments have an underlying ticker in the registry. Unmapped instruments are kept separate: they may include private-company exposure or incomplete records and are not assumed to be public stocks. These counts describe recorded deployments, not live liquidity, current issuer support, or worldwide availability.

Registry snapshot September 30, 2026

Why Solana appears so often

Solana combines wallet distribution, token infrastructure, and trading integrations that issuers can use for small fractional holdings. Its token extensions can also support corporate-action display adjustments. That helps explain its prominence in the registry; it does not establish that every token has a deep market.

Compare the actual token’s supported wallets and liquidity routes. A familiar wallet icon or an aggregator search result is not enough to establish authenticity. The mint address must match the issuer’s deployment.

Sources: xStocks: product documentation

Ethereum and the wider EVM ecosystem

Ethereum and EVM networks let token issuers use compatible contract and wallet tooling. The table shows which deployments this project records on Ethereum, Base, BNB, Arbitrum, and other networks without relying on a hand-written chain count.

Compatible software does not make networks interchangeable. An identical hexadecimal address on two chains refers to two separate pieces of chain state. A balance on one network is not automatically available on another, and an exchange may accept deposits on only one of them.

Native deployment or bridged representation?

An issuer-supported deployment and a third-party bridge wrapper can introduce different claims and failure points. A bridge may lock an original token and issue a representation elsewhere, adding custody, validator, or smart-contract dependencies.

Before moving a token, check both source and destination networks, the destination contract, who operates the route, and how the receiving token can be redeemed or moved back. A token name that includes ‘bridged’ is a clue to investigate, not evidence of issuer support.

Compare the route you can actually use

Network fees are one part of the cost. A cheap transfer can still lead to an expensive exit if a pool has little depth, the spread is wide, or your venue does not accept the token on that chain.

An onchain deployment also does not mean the share market, issuer redemption desk, or trading venue operates continuously. Treat prices outside underlying market hours as a separate liquidity question.

• Confirm the issuer’s current chain and contract list.
• Check wallet support for any token extensions and balance adjustments.
• Check withdrawal and deposit support for the exact network.
• Compare spread, depth, bridge fees, and redemption access.
• Keep investor eligibility separate from technical wallet compatibility.

Sources: Kraken: xStocks risk disclosure